Start
End
StartEnd
Updated:Apr 23, 2026
|Privacy Policy

The Nuremberg Trials and legal argumentation about aggressive war (1945–1949)

The Nuremberg Trials and legal argumentation about aggressive war (1945–1949)

  1. Allies commit to try major Nazi criminals

    Labels: Moscow Declaration, Allied Powers
  2. London Agreement creates the IMT and Charter

    Labels: London Agreement, International Military
  3. IMT indictment filed, charging crimes against peace

    Labels: IMT Indictment
  4. Trial opens at Nuremberg with guilty pleas denied

    Labels: Palace of, IMT Opening
  5. Jackson’s opening frames aggressive war as central crime

    Labels: Robert H
  6. Control Council Law No. 10 extends crimes against peace

    Labels: Control Council
  7. IMT judgment declares aggressive war the “supreme” crime

    Labels: IMT Judgment
  8. IMT verdicts and sentences issued

    Labels: IMT Verdicts
  9. Executions carried out after the IMT sentencing

    Labels: Nuremberg Executions
  10. Subsequent Nuremberg Trials begin under Law No. 10

    Labels: Subsequent Trials, Law No
  11. UN affirms Nuremberg principles in Resolution 95(I)

    Labels: UN Resolution
  12. UN directs ILC to formulate the Nuremberg Principles

    Labels: International Law, UN General
  13. Subsequent Nuremberg Trials conclude, shaping aggression doctrine

    Labels: Final Subsequent, Aggression Doctrine