Late 20th-Century Epistemological Challenges: Gettier, Skeptical Paradoxes, and Contextualist Responses (1963–2000)

1. Gettier challenges the JTB analysis

   Jun 1, 1963Labels: Edmund Gettier

   • OUP Analysis
   • JSTOR
   • SEP Knowledge

2. Goldman proposes a causal theory of knowing

   Jan 1, 1967Labels: Alvin Goldman

   • PhilPapers
   • JSTOR

3. Dretske introduces “relevant alternatives”

   Dec 1, 1970Labels: Fred Dretske

   • PDCnet
   • SEP Contextualism

4. Unger defends radical skepticism

   Jan 1, 1975Labels: Peter Unger

   • PhilPapers

5. Stine links relevant alternatives to closure debates

   Jan 1, 1976Labels: Gail Stine

   • PhilPapers
   • DocsLib PDF

6. Kripke presents “Pierre” and belief-ascription puzzles

   Jan 1, 1979Labels: Saul Kripke

   • PhilPapers
   • Logic Museum

7. Nozick offers a truth-tracking account of knowledge

   Jan 1, 1981Labels: Robert Nozick

   • REP Nozick
   • Wikipedia

8. Stroud reframes why skepticism matters

   Jul 5, 1984Labels: Barry Stroud

   • OUP Book
   • NLA Catalog

9. Cohen argues contextualism supports fallibilism

   Jan 1, 1988Labels: Stewart Cohen

   • CiNii

10. Williams critiques “foundational” skeptical assumptions

    Jan 1, 1991Labels: Michael Williams

    • Library Record

11. DeRose formalizes contextualism using “bank cases”

    Dec 1, 1992Labels: Keith DeRose

    • PDCnet
    • PhilPapers

12. DeRose applies contextualism to skeptical argument forms

    Jan 1, 1995Labels: Keith DeRose

    • PDCnet

13. Lewis develops a rule-based contextualism

    Jan 1, 1996Labels: David Lewis

    • Philos Annual

14. Cohen synthesizes contextualism and reasons-structure

    Oct 1, 1999Labels: Stewart Cohen

    • PhilPapers
    • Arizona Experts